On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 4:07 AM wrote:
>
> On 2 February 2024 00:02:54 CET, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 10:32 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 10:15:30AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> >> > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> >> >
On 2 February 2024 00:02:54 CET, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 10:32 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 10:15:30AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
>> > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
>> > @@ -22749,6 +22749,31 @@ current_fentry_section (const
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 10:32 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 10:15:30AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> > @@ -22749,6 +22749,31 @@ current_fentry_section (const char **name)
> >return true;
> > }
> >
> > +/* Retur
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 10:15:30AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> @@ -22749,6 +22749,31 @@ current_fentry_section (const char **name)
>return true;
> }
>
> +/* Return an unused caller-saved register at entry for profile. */
> +
> +sta
2 scratch registers, %r10 and %r11, are available at function entry for
large model profiling. But %r10 may be used by stack realignment and we
can't use %r10 in this case. Add x86_64_select_profile_regnum to find
a scratch register for large model profiling and sorry if we can't find
one.
gcc/
