On 14.07.2023 12:10, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:44 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> The corresponding insn serves this purpose quite fine, and leads to
>> slightly less (generated) code. All we need is the insn to not have a
>> leading * in its name, while retaining that * for "ext
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:44 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> The corresponding insn serves this purpose quite fine, and leads to
> slightly less (generated) code. All we need is the insn to not have a
> leading * in its name, while retaining that * for "extendhfsf2".
> Introduce a mode attribute in exc
The corresponding insn serves this purpose quite fine, and leads to
slightly less (generated) code. All we need is the insn to not have a
leading * in its name, while retaining that * for "extendhfsf2".
Introduce a mode attribute in exchange to achieve that.
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.md (ex
