Re: [PATCH] x86: Don't use address override with segment regsiter

2024-09-28 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 5:23 AM H.J. Lu wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024, 7:06 PM Uros Bizjak wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 11:42 AM H.J. Lu wrote: >> > >> > Address override only applies to the (reg32) part in the thread address >> > fs:(reg32). Don't rewrite thread address like >> > >>

Re: [PATCH] x86: Don't use address override with segment regsiter

2024-09-27 Thread H.J. Lu
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024, 7:06 PM Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 11:42 AM H.J. Lu wrote: > > > > Address override only applies to the (reg32) part in the thread address > > fs:(reg32). Don't rewrite thread address like > > > > (set (reg:CCZ 17 flags) > > (compare:CCZ (reg:SI 98 [

Re: [PATCH] x86: Don't use address override with segment regsiter

2024-09-25 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 11:42 AM H.J. Lu wrote: > > Address override only applies to the (reg32) part in the thread address > fs:(reg32). Don't rewrite thread address like > > (set (reg:CCZ 17 flags) > (compare:CCZ (reg:SI 98 [ __gmpfr_emax.0_1 ]) > (mem/c:SI (plus:SI (plus:SI (unspec

[PATCH] x86: Don't use address override with segment regsiter

2024-09-25 Thread H.J. Lu
Address override only applies to the (reg32) part in the thread address fs:(reg32). Don't rewrite thread address like (set (reg:CCZ 17 flags) (compare:CCZ (reg:SI 98 [ __gmpfr_emax.0_1 ]) (mem/c:SI (plus:SI (plus:SI (unspec:SI [ (const_int 0 [0])