Re: [PATCH] x86, v2: Define LIBGCC2_UNWIND_ATTRIBUTE on ia32 [PR104781]

2022-03-09 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 08:18:38AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > I wonder if this is a good case for general-regs-only instead? At > > least no-sse cannot be functionally equivalent (since then we would > > not have needed general-regs-only ...). > >

[PATCH] x86, v2: Define LIBGCC2_UNWIND_ATTRIBUTE on ia32 [PR104781]

2022-03-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 08:18:38AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > I wonder if this is a good case for general-regs-only instead? At > least no-sse cannot be functionally equivalent (since then we would > not have needed general-regs-only ...). I think general-regs-only is approx. equivalent to no