On 8/21/18 8:10 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> It didn't seem like we were making progress in the debate about
> warning for sprintf argument mismatches earlier today so I took
> a couple of hours this afternoon to prototype one of the solutions
> I was trying to describe. It mostly keeps the existing
It didn't seem like we were making progress in the debate about
warning for sprintf argument mismatches earlier today so I took
a couple of hours this afternoon to prototype one of the solutions
I was trying to describe. It mostly keeps the existing interface
and just extends c_strlen() and the o
