Hi!
On 2024-03-22T14:15:36+, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> On 22/03/2024 08:43, Richard Biener wrote:
> Thanks, here's what I pushed.
> vect: more oversized bitmask fixups
>
> These patches fix up a failure in testcase vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s278.c when
> configured to use V32 instead of V64 (I plan t
On 22/03/2024 08:43, Richard Biener wrote:
I'll note that we don't pass 'val' there and
'val' is unfortunately
not documented - what's it supposed to be? I think I placed the original fix in
do_compare_and_jump because we have the full into available there. So
what's the
do_compare_rtx_and_j
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:07 PM Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>
> On 21/03/2024 15:18, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:23 PM Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> >>
> >> My previous patch to fix this problem with xor was rejected because we
> >> want to fix these issues only at the point of use. Th
On 21/03/2024 15:18, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:23 PM Andrew Stubbs wrote:
My previous patch to fix this problem with xor was rejected because we
want to fix these issues only at the point of use. That patch produced
slightly better code, in this example, but this works t
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:23 PM Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>
> My previous patch to fix this problem with xor was rejected because we
> want to fix these issues only at the point of use. That patch produced
> slightly better code, in this example, but this works too
>
> These patches fix up a failu
My previous patch to fix this problem with xor was rejected because we
want to fix these issues only at the point of use. That patch produced
slightly better code, in this example, but this works too
These patches fix up a failure in testcase vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s278.c when
configured to use
