On 6/22/2021 3:41 AM, Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 10:37 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 6:53 PM Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches
wrote:
This test relies on wrap behavior of signed overflow. Without -
fwrapv
it is known to fail on mips (and maybe som
On 6/21/2021 10:51 AM, Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches wrote:
This test relies on wrap behavior of signed overflow. Without -fwrapv
it is known to fail on mips (and maybe some other targets as well).
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c: Add -fwrapv to avoid
undefin
On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 10:37 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 6:53 PM Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > This test relies on wrap behavior of signed overflow. Without -
> > fwrapv
> > it is known to fail on mips (and maybe some other targets as well).
>
> OK.
I don
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 6:53 PM Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> This test relies on wrap behavior of signed overflow. Without -fwrapv
> it is known to fail on mips (and maybe some other targets as well).
OK.
Richard.
> gcc/testsuite/
>
> * gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c: Add -fw
This test relies on wrap behavior of signed overflow. Without -fwrapv
it is known to fail on mips (and maybe some other targets as well).
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c: Add -fwrapv to avoid
undefined behavior.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-
