On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 2:13 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 10:16:44AM +, Navid Rahimi via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Thanks Jakob for the correction. Sadly, I didn’t have any access to any non
> > x86 architecture. But x86 was fully tested and there was no regression.
> >
>
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 10:16:44AM +, Navid Rahimi via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Thanks Jakob for the correction. Sadly, I didn’t have any access to any non
> x86 architecture. But x86 was fully tested and there was no regression.
>
> In my spare time I will look at implementation of this for shor
On Sat, 29 Jan 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 03:14:16PM -0700, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > This patch will add the missed pattern described in bug 103514 [1] to the
> > > match.pd. [1] includes proof of correctness for the patch too.
> > >
> > > PR tree-optimizat
Jelinek
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2022 8:46:09 AM
To: Richard Biener ; Jeff Law
Cc: Navid Rahimi ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] testsuite: Fix up tree-ssa/pr103514.c testcase
[PR103514]
[You don't often get email from ja...@redhat.com. Learn why this is importan
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 03:14:16PM -0700, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > This patch will add the missed pattern described in bug 103514 [1] to the
> > match.pd. [1] includes proof of correctness for the patch too.
> >
> > PR tree-optimization/103514
> > * match.pd (a & b) ^ (a == b) -> !
