Re: [PATCH] testsuite, lib: Re-allow mulitple function start labels.

Iain Sandoe writes: > Hi > >> On 23 Nov 2023, at 16:11, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> >> Hi Iain, >> >> Thanks for dealing with this :-) >> >> On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 10:58, Iain Sandoe wrote: >>> >>> Tested on a cross to armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf where the failing >>> testcase is restored,

Re: [PATCH] testsuite, lib: Re-allow mulitple function start labels.

On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 17:35, Iain Sandoe wrote: > > Hi > > > On 23 Nov 2023, at 16:11, Christophe Lyon > > wrote: > > > > Hi Iain, > > > > Thanks for dealing with this :-) > > > > On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 10:58, Iain Sandoe wrote: > >> > >> Tested on a cross to armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf whe

Re: [PATCH] testsuite, lib: Re-allow mulitple function start labels.

Hi > On 23 Nov 2023, at 16:11, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > Hi Iain, > > Thanks for dealing with this :-) > > On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 10:58, Iain Sandoe wrote: >> >> Tested on a cross to armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf where the failing >> testcase is restored, and on aarch64-linux-gnu where no

Re: [PATCH] testsuite, lib: Re-allow mulitple function start labels.

Hi Iain, Thanks for dealing with this :-) On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 10:58, Iain Sandoe wrote: > > Tested on a cross to armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf where the failing > testcase is restored, and on aarch64-linux-gnu where no change is seen > on the aarch64.exp suite. Also tested on arm64 Darwin f

[PATCH] testsuite, lib: Re-allow mulitple function start labels.

Tested on a cross to armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf where the failing testcase is restored, and on aarch64-linux-gnu where no change is seen on the aarch64.exp suite. Also tested on arm64 Darwin for aarch64.exp and aarch64-darwin.exp. OK for trunk, or some alternative would be better? Iain --- 8