(EAF_NO_DIRECT_CLOBBER | EAF_NO_INDIRECT_CLOBBER))
>> + return true;
>
> Why both EAF_NO_DIRECT_CLOBBER and EAF_NO_INDIRECT_CLOBBER? I think
> EAF_NO_DIRECT_CLOBBER is enough unless you think that you didn't rule
> out the decl to point to itself by the escaping means? Warran
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> PR109849 shows that a loop that heavily pushes and pops from a stack
> implemented by a C++ std::vec results in slow code, mainly because the
> vector structure is not split by SRA and so we end up in many loads
> and stores into it. This is
Hello,
PR109849 shows that a loop that heavily pushes and pops from a stack
implemented by a C++ std::vec results in slow code, mainly because the
vector structure is not split by SRA and so we end up in many loads
and stores into it. This is because it is passed by reference
to (re)allocation me
