Re: [PATCH] s390: Remove -m{,no-}lra option

2024-09-20 Thread Andreas Krebbel
On 9/19/24 16:05, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: I have been missing the two test cases and removed them since they depend on -mno-lra. -- 8< -- Since the old reload pass is about to be removed and we defaulted to LRA for over a decade, remove option -m{,no-}lra. PR target/113953 gcc/Chan

Re: [PATCH] s390: Remove -m{,no-}lra option

2024-09-19 Thread Sam James
Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus writes: > I have been missing the two test cases and removed them since they > depend on -mno-lra. Can't approve but it looks right. Thanks for handling it, especially so quickly! > > -- 8< -- > > Since the old reload pass is about to be removed and we defaulted to L

[PATCH] s390: Remove -m{,no-}lra option

2024-09-19 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
I have been missing the two test cases and removed them since they depend on -mno-lra. -- 8< -- Since the old reload pass is about to be removed and we defaulted to LRA for over a decade, remove option -m{,no-}lra. PR target/113953 gcc/ChangeLog: * config/s390/s390.cc (s390_lra_p): Rem

[PATCH] s390: Remove -m{,no-}lra option

2024-09-19 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
Since the old reload pass is about to be removed and we defaulted to LRA for over a decade, remove option -m{,no-}lra. PR target/113953 gcc/ChangeLog: * config/s390/s390.cc (s390_lra_p): Remove. (TARGET_LRA_P): Remove. * config/s390/s390.opt (mlra): Remove. * conf