On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 09:52:43PM +, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> C++98 does not have long long int, and does not use (unsigned) long
> long int for hexadecimal literals. So let's use an ULL suffix here,
> which is still not strict C++98, but which works with more compilers.
>
> Tested etc.;
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 09:15:38AM +0100, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 11/12/19 10:52 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > C++98 does not have long long int, and does not use (unsigned) long
> > long int for hexadecimal literals. So let's use an ULL suffix here,
> > which is still not strict C++98,
C++98 does not have long long int, and does not use (unsigned) long
long int for hexadecimal literals. So let's use an ULL suffix here,
which is still not strict C++98, but which works with more compilers.
Tested etc.; committing to trunk.
Segher
2019-11-12 Segher Boessenkool
* co
