On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:10:29AM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 7/24/20 6:32 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 08:15:42PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> >> + /* If the user explicitly uses -mpower10, ensure our ISA flags are
> >> + compatible with it. */
> >> + if
On 7/24/20 6:32 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 08:15:42PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> + /* If the user explicitly uses -mpower10, ensure our ISA flags are
>> + compatible with it. */
>> + if (TARGET_POWER10
>> + && (rs6000_isa_flags_explicit & OPTION_MASK_POW
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 08:15:42PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> We get an ICE when using -mpower10 and a -mcpu= value that is older
> than power10. The -mpower10 option requires -mcpu=power10 or later.
> The following patch enforces that.
Hi!
> + /* If the user explicitly uses -mpower10, ensur
We get an ICE when using -mpower10 and a -mcpu= value that is older
than power10. The -mpower10 option requires -mcpu=power10 or later.
The following patch enforces that.
This passed bootstrap and regtesting with no errors. Ok for trunk?
GCC 10 does not ICE on this test case, so I am not asking