Hi!
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 09:06:25PM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 09:10, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >On 20/04/2021 17:00, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>There are various non-IBM CPUs with isel as well, so it is easiest if we
> >>just don't consider that flag here (it is not needed
On 11/01/2022 09:10, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello Segher,
On 20/04/2021 17:00, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
There are various non-IBM CPUs with isel as well, so it is easiest if we
just don't consider that flag here (it is not needed).
2021-04-20 Segher Boessenkool
PR target/100108
* co
Hello Segher,
On 20/04/2021 17:00, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
There are various non-IBM CPUs with isel as well, so it is easiest if we
just don't consider that flag here (it is not needed).
2021-04-20 Segher Boessenkool
PR target/100108
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_machine_
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 03:00:42PM +, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> There are various non-IBM CPUs with isel as well, so it is easiest if we
> just don't consider that flag here (it is not needed).
>
> 2021-04-20 Segher Boessenkool
>
> PR target/100108
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.c
There are various non-IBM CPUs with isel as well, so it is easiest if we
just don't consider that flag here (it is not needed).
2021-04-20 Segher Boessenkool
PR target/100108
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_machine_from_flags): Do not consider
OPTION_MASK_ISEL.
---
Com
