Hi!
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 09:40:16AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> A function compiled with the PC-relative addressing model does not
> require r2 to contain a TOC pointer, and does not guarantee that r2
> will be preserved for its caller. Such a function can make sibcalls
> without restriction
I failed to mention that this has been bootstrapped and tested on
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu, with no regressions. Is this ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Bill
On 8/19/20 9:40 AM, Bill Schmidt via Gcc-patches wrote:
A function compiled with the PC-relative addressing model does not
require r2 to con
A function compiled with the PC-relative addressing model does not
require r2 to contain a TOC pointer, and does not guarantee that r2
will be preserved for its caller. Such a function can make sibcalls
without restriction based on TOC preservation rules. However, a
caller that does preserve r2 c
