On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> The compiler cannot assume that the eqsi etc. patterns write a properly
> extended result to a DI reg. The current way to tell it is to add an
> extra pattern with an extend. This patch does that. A less cumbersome
> method of specifyi
The compiler cannot assume that the eqsi etc. patterns write a properly
extended result to a DI reg. The current way to tell it is to add an
extra pattern with an extend. This patch does that. A less cumbersome
method of specifying this would be nice -- maybe one where we say in
the SI pattern t
