Re: [PATCH] remove workaround for GCC 4.1-4.3

2023-09-29 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On 27 September 2023 06:46:29 CEST, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >On 27 September 2023 06:43:24 CEST, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >>Hi! >> >>While looking into vec.h, I've noticed we still have a workaround for >>GCC 4.1-4.3 bugs. > > >This is https://gcc.gnu.org/PR105656 >thanks, Mere cosmetics, b

Re: [PATCH] remove workaround for GCC 4.1-4.3

2023-09-26 Thread Richard Biener
> Am 27.09.2023 um 06:43 schrieb Jakub Jelinek : > > Hi! > > While looking into vec.h, I've noticed we still have a workaround for > GCC 4.1-4.3 bugs. > As we now use C++11 and thus need to be built by GCC 4.8 or later, > I think this is now never used. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-l

Re: [PATCH] remove workaround for GCC 4.1-4.3

2023-09-26 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On 27 September 2023 06:43:24 CEST, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >Hi! > >While looking into vec.h, I've noticed we still have a workaround for >GCC 4.1-4.3 bugs. This is https://gcc.gnu.org/PR105656 thanks, >As we now use C++11 and thus need to be built by GCC 4.8 or later, >I think this is now never u

[PATCH] remove workaround for GCC 4.1-4.3

2023-09-26 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! While looking into vec.h, I've noticed we still have a workaround for GCC 4.1-4.3 bugs. As we now use C++11 and thus need to be built by GCC 4.8 or later, I think this is now never used. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2023-09-27 Jakub Jelinek