On 12/5/22 19:35, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi!
According to
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-regression/2022-December/077258.html
Seen in the wild too - compiling one of the two weather forecasting
programs I use:
during GIMPLE pass: dom
/home/toon/scratch/hm_home/my_CY46h1/l
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> According to
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-regression/2022-December/077258.html
> my patch caused some ICEs, e.g. the following testcase ICEs.
> The problem is that lower_bound and upper_bound methods on a france assert
> that the range is
Hi!
According to
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-regression/2022-December/077258.html
my patch caused some ICEs, e.g. the following testcase ICEs.
The problem is that lower_bound and upper_bound methods on a france assert
that the range isn't VR_NAN or VR_UNDEFINED.
All the op1_range/op2_range
