Hi!
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 01:42:24PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> > I think personally I'd prefer an option (3): call
> > target_option_override_hook directly in decode_options,
> > if help_option_arguments is nonempty. Like you say,
> > decode_options appears to be the only caller of print_help.
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the comments!
on 2020/8/13 上午12:10, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> "Kewen.Lin" writes:
>> Hi Segher,
>>
>> on 2020/8/7 锟斤拷锟斤拷10:42, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 10:44:10AM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> I think this makes a lot of sense.
>>>
"Kewen.Lin" writes:
> Hi Segher,
>
> on 2020/8/7 锟斤拷锟斤拷10:42, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 10:44:10AM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
I think this makes a lot of sense.
> btw, not sure whether it's a good idea to move target_option_override_hook
> call
Hi Segher,
on 2020/8/7 下午10:42, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 10:44:10AM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>>> I think this makes a lot of sense.
>>>
btw, not sure whether it's a good idea to move target_option_override_hook
call into print_specific_help and use one
