On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 08:15:56PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> On 18/12/2020 7:31 pm, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:10:52PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> > > 2020-12-17 Kwok Cheung Yeung
> > >
> > > gcc/testsuite/
> > > * g++.dg/gomp/declare-target-3.C: New.
On 18/12/2020 7:31 pm, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:10:52PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
2020-12-17 Kwok Cheung Yeung
gcc/testsuite/
* g++.dg/gomp/declare-target-3.C: New.
Note the test fails on the trunk when one doesn't have offloading
configured. I
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:10:52PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> 2020-12-17 Kwok Cheung Yeung
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> * g++.dg/gomp/declare-target-3.C: New.
Note the test fails on the trunk when one doesn't have offloading
configured. IL scan tests are always problematic, differe
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:10:52PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> --- a/gcc/cp/cp-lang.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-lang.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ static tree cp_eh_personality (void);
> static tree get_template_innermost_arguments_folded (const_tree);
> static tree get_template_argument_pack_elems_folded
On 08/12/2020 4:24 pm, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
The GCC coding style (appart from libstdc++) is type * rather than type*,
occurs several times in the patch.
Fixed.
+{
+ tree node;
+
+ if (DECL_INITIAL (decl))
+return &DECL_INITIAL (decl);
+
+ for (node = dynamic_initializers; node; node =
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 06:07:28PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> Even without this patch, G++ currently accepts something like
Sorry for the delay.
> int foo() { return 1; }
> int x = foo();
> #pragma omp declare target to(x)
>
> but will not generate the device-side initializer for x, even
Hello
This patch still needs review.
Thanks
Kwok
On 19/11/2020 6:07 pm, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
On 29/10/2020 10:03 am, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I'm actually not sure how this can work correctly.
Let's say we have
int foo () { return 1; }
int bar () { return 2; }
int baz () { return 3; }
int qu
On 29/10/2020 10:03 am, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I'm actually not sure how this can work correctly.
Let's say we have
int foo () { return 1; }
int bar () { return 2; }
int baz () { return 3; }
int qux () { return 4; }
int a = foo ();
int b = bar ();
int c = baz ();
int *d = &c;
int e = qux ();
int f
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 02:20:29PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> OpenMP 5.0 has a new feature for implicitly marking variables and functions
> that are referenced in the initializers of static variables and functions
> that are already marked 'declare target'. Support was added in the commit
>
Hello
OpenMP 5.0 has a new feature for implicitly marking variables and functions that
are referenced in the initializers of static variables and functions that are
already marked 'declare target'. Support was added in the commit 'openmp:
Implement discovery of implicit declare target to claus
10 matches
Mail list logo
