On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 14:51, Ville Voutilainen
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 16:47, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > I don't think using a macro for these really saves us much, we can do
> > this to avoid duplication instead. And now it's not a big, multi-line
> > macro that's a pain to edit.
>
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 16:47, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> I don't think using a macro for these really saves us much, we can do
> this to avoid duplication instead. And now it's not a big, multi-line
> macro that's a pain to edit.
>
> Any objections?
No, that's beautiful, ship it.
I don't think using a macro for these really saves us much, we can do
this to avoid duplication instead. And now it's not a big, multi-line
macro that's a pain to edit.
Any objections?
Tested x86_64-linux.
-- >8 --
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/variant (__detail::__variant::__c
