On Sun, 18 Aug 2024, 23:39 Eric Gallager, wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 4:52 AM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> >
> > When I updated one of the links yesterday I noticed we have this obsolete
> > reference to GCC 4.0.1 and binutils 2.15.90.0.1.1 from 19 (nineteen)
> years
> > ago.
> >
> > I suggest w
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 3:42 PM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 3:39 PM Eric Gallager wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 4:52 AM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > >
> > > When I updated one of the links yesterday I noticed we have this obsolete
> > > reference to GCC 4.0.1 and binut
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 3:39 PM Eric Gallager wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 4:52 AM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> >
> > When I updated one of the links yesterday I noticed we have this obsolete
> > reference to GCC 4.0.1 and binutils 2.15.90.0.1.1 from 19 (nineteen) years
> > ago.
> >
> > I sugges
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 4:52 AM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
> When I updated one of the links yesterday I noticed we have this obsolete
> reference to GCC 4.0.1 and binutils 2.15.90.0.1.1 from 19 (nineteen) years
> ago.
>
> I suggest we remove these.
>
Instead of just removing it, I wonder if it migh
On Sun, 18 Aug 2024, 09:53 Gerald Pfeifer, wrote:
> When I updated one of the links yesterday I noticed we have this obsolete
> reference to GCC 4.0.1 and binutils 2.15.90.0.1.1 from 19 (nineteen) years
> ago.
>
> I suggest we remove these.
>
> Okay?
>
OK
> Gerald
>
>
> libstdc++-v3:
>
When I updated one of the links yesterday I noticed we have this obsolete
reference to GCC 4.0.1 and binutils 2.15.90.0.1.1 from 19 (nineteen) years
ago.
I suggest we remove these.
Okay?
Gerald
libstdc++-v3:
* doc/xml/manual/prerequisites.xml: Remove note from the GCC 4.0.1
da
