Pushed to trunk now.
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 01:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> Tested x86_64-linux.
>
> Does this look right? Can we do it faster, or simplify it?
>
> -- >8 --
>
> This reduces the overhead of using std::is_trivially_destructible_v and
> as a result fixes some recent regressions se
Tested x86_64-linux.
Does this look right? Can we do it faster, or simplify it?
-- >8 --
This reduces the overhead of using std::is_trivially_destructible_v and
as a result fixes some recent regressions seen with a non-default
GLIBCXX_TESTSUITE_STDS env var:
FAIL: 20_util/variant/87619.cc -std=
