On 25/11/20 18:39 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25/11/20 10:35 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I've pushed that as ad9cbcee543ecccd79fa49dafcd925532d2ce210 but there
are still other FAILs to be fixed.
I think the other FAILs are due to a race condition in the tests,
fixed by this patch. Teste
On 25/11/20 10:35 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I've pushed that as ad9cbcee543ecccd79fa49dafcd925532d2ce210 but there
are still other FAILs to be fixed.
I think the other FAILs are due to a race condition in the tests,
fixed by this patch. Tested x86_64-linux, powerpc64le-linux,
sparc-solaris2
On 25/11/20 10:35 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25/11/20 01:07 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/11/20 23:45 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/11/20 16:36 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 9:40 AM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 21/11/20 17:04 +, Jonathan Wa
On 25/11/20 01:07 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/11/20 23:45 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/11/20 16:36 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 9:40 AM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 21/11/20 17:04 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/11/20 16:16 +0100, Andreas Sch
On 24/11/20 23:45 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/11/20 16:36 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 9:40 AM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 21/11/20 17:04 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/11/20 16:16 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
In file included from
/daten/aranym/
On 21/11/20 16:36 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 9:40 AM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 21/11/20 17:04 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>On 21/11/20 16:16 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>In file included from
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201121/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/i
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 1:31 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On 22/11/20 13:37 +, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote:
> >On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, 12:29 Iain Sandoe, wrote:
> >
> >> thanks for looking at this over the weekend.
> >>
> >> Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sat, 21
On 22/11/20 22:13 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 20/11/2020 23:44, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed.
Clang complains:
$ cat test.cc
#include
$ clang++ --gcc-toolchain=~/gcc/trunk/inst -std=c++20 -fsyntax-only test.cc
In file included from test.cc:1:
In file in
On 22/11/20 22:41 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 20/11/2020 23:44, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed.
...and there are multiple definition complaints from the linker
because of two missing "include":
index 7b2682a577e..23ab2018ca8 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/incl
On 23/11/20 18:31 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 22/11/20 13:37 +, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, 12:29 Iain Sandoe, wrote:
thanks for looking at this over the weekend.
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 23:55, David Edelsohn via
On 22/11/20 13:37 +, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, 12:29 Iain Sandoe, wrote:
thanks for looking at this over the weekend.
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 23:55, David Edelsohn via Libstdc++
> wrote:
>> I am seeing 93 new libst
On 22/11/20 01:27 +, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 23:55, David Edelsohn via Libstdc++
wrote:
I am seeing 93 new libstdc++ failures on AIX, even after Jonathan's
fixes. And a few c++ failures with similar symptoms. I'm not certain
that it is due to this patc
On 21/11/20 17:39 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/11/20 17:04 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/11/20 16:16 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
In file included from
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201121/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:33,
from
/daten/aran
On 21/11/20 16:36 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 9:40 AM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 21/11/20 17:04 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>On 21/11/20 16:16 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>In file included from
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201121/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/i
On 20/11/2020 23:44, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed.
...and there are multiple definition complaints from the linker because
of two missing "include":
index 7b2682a577e..23ab2018ca8 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_wait.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/
On 20/11/2020 23:44, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed.
Clang complains:
$ cat test.cc
#include
$ clang++ --gcc-toolchain=~/gcc/trunk/inst -std=c++20 -fsyntax-only test.cc
In file included from test.cc:1:
In file included from
~/gcc/trunk/inst/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-li
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, 12:29 Iain Sandoe, wrote:
> thanks for looking at this over the weekend.
>
> Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 23:55, David Edelsohn via Libstdc++
> > wrote:
> >> I am seeing 93 new libstdc++ failures on AIX, even after Jonathan's
> >> fixe
thanks for looking at this over the weekend.
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 23:55, David Edelsohn via Libstdc++
wrote:
I am seeing 93 new libstdc++ failures on AIX, even after Jonathan's
fixes. And a few c++ failures with similar symptoms. I'm not certain
tha
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 23:55, David Edelsohn via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> I am seeing 93 new libstdc++ failures on AIX, even after Jonathan's
> fixes. And a few c++ failures with similar symptoms. I'm not certain
> that it is due to this patch, but it's the likely suspect.
Yes, it's that patch.
Thi
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 9:40 AM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On 21/11/20 17:04 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >On 21/11/20 16:16 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >>In file included from
> >>/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201121/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:
I am seeing 93 new libstdc++ failures on AIX, even after Jonathan's
fixes. And a few c++ failures with similar symptoms. I'm not certain
that it is due to this patch, but it's the likely suspect.
FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2020/all_attributes.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++
On 21/11/20 17:04 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/11/20 16:16 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
In file included from
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201121/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:33,
from
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201121/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v
On 21/11/20 16:16 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
In file included from
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201121/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:33,
from
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201121/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/memory:78,
from
/date
In file included from
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201121/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:33,
from
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201121/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/memory:78,
from
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201121/Build/m68k-linux/libs
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed.
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 3:23 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On 26/10/20 14:48 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
>> +#include
>> +
>> +#if __has_include()
>> +#define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_POSIX_SEMAPHORE 1
>> +#include
>
> It occurs to me now that this check probably i
On 26/10/20 14:48 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
+#include
+
+#if __has_include()
+#define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_POSIX_SEMAPHORE 1
+#include
It occurs to me now that this check probably isn't robust enough. For
any POSIX system it's probably safe to assume that means
the POSIX header and so sem_t is a
From: Thomas Rodgers
Add support for -
* atomic_flag::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* atomic::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* counting_semaphore
* binary_semaphore
* latch
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/Makefile.am (bits_headers): Add new header.
* include/Makefile.in: Re
From: Thomas Rodgers
Updated patch incorporating latest feedback (revised).
Add support for -
* atomic_flag::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* atomic::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* counting_semaphore
* binary_semaphore
* latch
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/Makefile.am (bits_hea
From: Thomas Rodgers
Updated patch incorporating latest feedback.
Add support for -
* atomic_flag::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* atomic::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* counting_semaphore
* binary_semaphore
* latch
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/Makefile.am (bits_headers): Add
On 28/09/20 14:29 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
+template
+ __atomic_wait_status
+ __platform_wait_until_impl(__platform_wait_t* __addr,
+__platform_wait_t __val,
+const
chrono::time_point<__platform_wait_clock_t,
+
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> On 11/09/20 16:58 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
>>From: Thomas Rodgers
>>
>>This patch supercedes both the Add C++2a synchronization support patch
>>being replied to *and* the patch adding wait/notify_* to atomic_flag.
>>
>>Add support for -
>> * atomic_flag::wait/noti
On 11/09/20 16:58 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
From: Thomas Rodgers
This patch supercedes both the Add C++2a synchronization support patch
being replied to *and* the patch adding wait/notify_* to atomic_flag.
Add support for -
* atomic_flag::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* atomic::wait/notify_o
On 11/09/20 16:58 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
From: Thomas Rodgers
This patch supercedes both the Add C++2a synchronization support patch
being replied to *and* the patch adding wait/notify_* to atomic_flag.
Add support for -
* atomic_flag::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* atomic::wait/notify_o
On 11/09/20 16:58 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
From: Thomas Rodgers
This patch supercedes both the Add C++2a synchronization support patch
being replied to *and* the patch adding wait/notify_* to atomic_flag.
Add support for -
* atomic_flag::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* atomic::wait/notify_o
From: Thomas Rodgers
This patch supercedes both the Add C++2a synchronization support patch
being replied to *and* the patch adding wait/notify_* to atomic_flag.
Add support for -
* atomic_flag::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* atomic::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* counting_semaphore
* binary
35 matches
Mail list logo
