On Mon, 12 May 2025 14:05:50 +0200
Rainer Orth wrote:
> Before going further, I'd first like to understand why you chose to
> use syslog in a runtime lib. While logging to syslog is certainly
> useful in daemons and such, a runtime lib is different IMO: while
> regular users can log to syslog, a
Hi Robert,
> If you have a patch that works for you, by all means, push it.
done now, thanks.
> As for the philosophy and reasons for logging...I have to defer to Jim to
> come up with a cogent response. I personally wouldn't have bothered with
> any logging code. There may be some delays in h
Subject: [PATCH] libgcobol: Allow for lack of LOG_PERROR
>
> The libgcobol build is broken again on Solaris:
>
> /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libgcobol/libgcobol.cc: In function 'void
> default_exception_handler(ec_type_t)':
> /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libgcobol/libgcob
The libgcobol build is broken again on Solaris:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libgcobol/libgcobol.cc: In function ‘void
default_exception_handler(ec_type_t)’:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libgcobol/libgcobol.cc:11196:44: error:
‘LOG_PERROR’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘LOG_ERR’?