> On 11 Jun 2025, at 15:17, FX Coudert wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I am just wondering if the order in Makefile.am as it is now is needed. E.g.
>> pack_* follows pow_* and some other are not lexicographicaly ordered. Are
>> there
>> dependencies that necessitate this? Or could you just sort them, so
Hi,
> I am just wondering if the order in Makefile.am as it is now is needed. E.g.
> pack_* follows pow_* and some other are not lexicographicaly ordered. Are
> there
> dependencies that necessitate this? Or could you just sort them, so that
> looking up files is easier for humans?
I think they
Hi FX,
I am just wondering if the order in Makefile.am as it is now is needed. E.g.
pack_* follows pow_* and some other are not lexicographicaly ordered. Are there
dependencies that necessitate this? Or could you just sort them, so that
looking up files is easier for humans?
Besides the comment,
> the patch looks good to me. I only have x86_64, too, therefore I haven't
> tested
> it (again). There's a lot of repetition in the regenerate.sh file. I hope to
> see this "simplified" or rather DRY'ed (Don't repeat yourself - principle) in
> the future.
Following up on this, here is a new patc
