On 5/6/25 6:49 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
The backport of the PR108900 fix to 14 branch broke building chromium
because static_assert (__LINE__ == expected_line_number, ""); now triggers
as the __LINE__ values are off by one.
This isn't the case on the trunk and 15 branch because we've switche
On Tue, 6 May 2025, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Here is the 14 branch version of the PR120061 fix I've just posted
> for 16/15.
> The differences from the earlier patch are all caused by the
> 32-bit location_t on the branch instead of 64-bit location_t that
> 16/15 has.
> So, it needs 1 << wh
Hi!
Here is the 14 branch version of the PR120061 fix I've just posted
for 16/15.
The differences from the earlier patch are all caused by the
32-bit location_t on the branch instead of 64-bit location_t that
16/15 has.
So, it needs 1 << whatever instead of loc_one << whatever in the
sources, and
Hi!
The backport of the PR108900 fix to 14 branch broke building chromium
because static_assert (__LINE__ == expected_line_number, ""); now triggers
as the __LINE__ values are off by one.
This isn't the case on the trunk and 15 branch because we've switched
to 64-bit location_t and so one actually
