On Thu, 5 Oct 2023, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The following patch removes ipa_bits struct pointer/vector from ipa
> jump functions and ipa cp transformations.
>
> The reason is because the struct uses widest_int to represent
> mask/value pair, which in the RFC patches to allow larger precis
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 04:42:42PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> It does look like a nice cleanup to me.
> I wonder if you did some compare of the bit information propagated with
> new code and old code? Theoretically they should be equivalent?
Beyond testsuite, I've tried
__attribute__((noinline,
> Hi!
>
> The following patch removes ipa_bits struct pointer/vector from ipa
> jump functions and ipa cp transformations.
>
> The reason is because the struct uses widest_int to represent
> mask/value pair, which in the RFC patches to allow larger precisions
> for wide_int/widest_int is GC unfri
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023, 8:26 a.m. Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The following patch removes ipa_bits struct pointer/vector from ipa
> jump functions and ipa cp transformations.
>
> The reason is because the struct uses widest_int to represent
> mask/value pair, which in the RFC patches to allow lar
Hi!
The following patch removes ipa_bits struct pointer/vector from ipa
jump functions and ipa cp transformations.
The reason is because the struct uses widest_int to represent
mask/value pair, which in the RFC patches to allow larger precisions
for wide_int/widest_int is GC unfriendly because th
