On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:41:14 +0200
Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 27 2020, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 8:35 PM Sergei Trofimovich via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Sergei Trofimovich
> >>
> >> In PR ipa/96291 the test contained an SC
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 27 2020, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 8:35 PM Sergei Trofimovich via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>> From: Sergei Trofimovich
>>
>> In PR ipa/96291 the test contained an SCC with one
>> unoptimized function. This tricked ipa-cp into NULL dereference.
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 25 2020, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> From: Sergei Trofimovich
>
> In PR ipa/96291 the test contained an SCC with one
> unoptimized function. This tricked ipa-cp into NULL dereference.
>
> has_undead_caller_from_outside_scc_p() did not take into account
> that unoptimized funtions
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 8:35 PM Sergei Trofimovich via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> From: Sergei Trofimovich
>
> In PR ipa/96291 the test contained an SCC with one
> unoptimized function. This tricked ipa-cp into NULL dereference.
>
> has_undead_caller_from_outside_scc_p() did not take into account
> t
From: Sergei Trofimovich
In PR ipa/96291 the test contained an SCC with one
unoptimized function. This tricked ipa-cp into NULL dereference.
has_undead_caller_from_outside_scc_p() did not take into account
that unoptimized funtions don't have IPA summary analysis. and
dereferenced NULL pointer c
