Re: [GCC 8] [PATCH] i386: Remove _Unwind_Frames_Increment

2018-10-03 Thread Jeff Law
On 9/29/18 4:10 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to backport r263030: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2018-07/msg00756.html > > to GCC 8 for CET. Is it OK? OK. jeff

[GCC 8] [PATCH] i386: Remove _Unwind_Frames_Increment

2018-09-29 Thread H.J. Lu
Hi, I'd like to backport r263030: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2018-07/msg00756.html to GCC 8 for CET. Is it OK? Thanks. -- H.J.

PING [PATCH] i386: Remove _Unwind_Frames_Increment

2018-07-26 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:15 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: > Tested on CET SDV using the CET kernel on cet branch at: > > https://github.com/yyu168/linux_cet/tree/cet > > OK for trunk and GCC 8 branch? > > Thanks. > > > H.J. > --- > The CET kernel has been changed to place a restore token on shadow stack >

[PATCH] i386: Remove _Unwind_Frames_Increment

2018-07-20 Thread H.J. Lu
Tested on CET SDV using the CET kernel on cet branch at: https://github.com/yyu168/linux_cet/tree/cet OK for trunk and GCC 8 branch? Thanks. H.J. --- The CET kernel has been changed to place a restore token on shadow stack for signal handler to enhance security. It is usually transparent to u