Hi Jeff,
> The reversion of the loop-init.cc changes is fine. The x86 maintainers
> will need to chime in on the rest. Consider installing the loop-init.cc
> reversion immediately as the current state has regressed s390 and
> potentially other targets.
I've posted a patch in
https://gcc.gnu.org
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 1:41 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>
> On 11/18/22 23:25, Hongyu Wang via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Followed by the discussion in pr107602, -munroll-only-small-loops
> > Does not turns on/off -funroll-loops, and current check in
> > pass_rtl_unroll_loops::ga
On 11/18/22 23:25, Hongyu Wang via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi,
Followed by the discussion in pr107602, -munroll-only-small-loops
Does not turns on/off -funroll-loops, and current check in
pass_rtl_unroll_loops::gate would cause -funroll-loops do not take
effect. Revert the change about targetm.loop
iz...@gmail.com; Liu, Hongtao
> > >
> > > Subject: [PATCH] i386: Only enable small loop unrolling in backend [PR
> > > 107602]
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Followed by the discussion in pr107602, -munroll-only-small-loops Does not
>
mail.com; Liu, Hongtao
> >
> > Subject: [PATCH] i386: Only enable small loop unrolling in backend [PR
> > 107602]
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Followed by the discussion in pr107602, -munroll-only-small-loops Does not
> PR107692?
> > turns on/off -funroll-loop
> -Original Message-
> From: Wang, Hongyu
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2022 2:26 PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: richard.guent...@gmail.com; ubiz...@gmail.com; Liu, Hongtao
>
> Subject: [PATCH] i386: Only enable small loop unrolling in backen
Hi,
Followed by the discussion in pr107602, -munroll-only-small-loops
Does not turns on/off -funroll-loops, and current check in
pass_rtl_unroll_loops::gate would cause -funroll-loops do not take
effect. Revert the change about targetm.loop_unroll_adjust and apply
the backend option change to stri
