On Mon, 2020-08-24 at 12:51 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2020, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 04:30:35PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > Not a final review but if we care for this kind of normalization at all
> > > the we should do so consistently, thus for
On Wed, 12 Aug 2020, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 04:30:35PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Not a final review but if we care for this kind of normalization at all
> > the we should do so consistently, thus for both encode and interpret and
> > for all modes. For FP we could a
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 04:30:35PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> Not a final review but if we care for this kind of normalization at all
> the we should do so consistently, thus for both encode and interpret and
> for all modes. For FP we could also check if we'd consider the values
> equal rathe
On August 12, 2020 10:45:12 AM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>My patch to introduce native_encode_initializer to fold_ctor_reference
>apparently broke gnulib/m4 on powerpc64.
>There it uses a const union with two doubles and corresponding IBM
>double
>double long double which actually is
Hi!
My patch to introduce native_encode_initializer to fold_ctor_reference
apparently broke gnulib/m4 on powerpc64.
There it uses a const union with two doubles and corresponding IBM double
double long double which actually is the largest normalizable long double
value (1 ulp higher than __LDBL_MA