On Mon, 5 Jun 2017, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 06/05/2017 08:50 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > It was the intent that there is no unnecessary gap, the difference
> > between those two should be simply the maximum any FE registers.
> > So, on your branch you'd bump it to 4 and on trunk when mergin
On 06/05/2017 08:50 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
It was the intent that there is no unnecessary gap, the difference
between those two should be simply the maximum any FE registers.
So, on your branch you'd bump it to 4 and on trunk when merging your branch.
I can live with that.
nathan
--
Nathan
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 08:46:21AM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 06/05/2017 07:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > Whether there is a blank between function and its function comment
> > is something we aren't consistent in, but it seems that in dumpfile.c
> > there is a blank line, so I'm adjust
On 06/05/2017 07:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Whether there is a blank between function and its function comment
is something we aren't consistent in, but it seems that in dumpfile.c
there is a blank line, so I'm adjusting.
Ok (I only know the blank line rule because someone nitted one of my
p
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 06:57:47AM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 06/05/2017 05:46 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > Here is a patch to implement that. I chose to keep the 3 dumps predefined
> > dumps and just tweak their registered number, otherwise the changes would be
> > bigger.
>
> Yeah, th
On 06/05/2017 05:46 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Here is a patch to implement that. I chose to keep the 3 dumps predefined
dumps and just tweak their registered number, otherwise the changes would be
bigger.
Yeah, that can wait for another day.
The patch additionally renames TDI_generic to TDI
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 08:00:30AM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 05/24/2017 07:57 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > The numbering is not to differentiate between dumps of the same name, that
> > is done through numbered suffixes of the dump names, but to make the order
> > of passes visible to th
On 05/24/2017 07:57 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
The numbering is not to differentiate between dumps of the same name, that
is done through numbered suffixes of the dump names, but to make the order
of passes visible to the user and for sorted file listing to be provided in
that order. So, rather t
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 07:44:49AM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 05/24/2017 06:57 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > So, first question, where should we order the -fdump-lang-* dumps, shall
> > they go before .original/.gimple/.nested, or in between .original and
> > .gimple/.nested, or after thos
On 05/24/2017 06:57 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
So, first question, where should we order the -fdump-lang-* dumps, shall
they go before .original/.gimple/.nested, or in between .original and
.gimple/.nested, or after those 3 (the last option looks just wrong to me)?
I think the lang dumps should
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:57:28PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> So, first question, where should we order the -fdump-lang-* dumps, shall
> they go before .original/.gimple/.nested, or in between .original and
> .gimple/.nested, or after those 3 (the last option looks just wrong to me)?
> Shall the
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:08:51AM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 05/16/2017 11:26 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > This patch breaks apart the creation of the pass manager from
> > gcc::context's ctor. This will allow us to register additional dumps
> ... https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-0
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 05/16/2017 11:26 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>>
>> This patch breaks apart the creation of the pass manager from
>> gcc::context's ctor. This will allow us to register additional dumps
>
> ... https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> This patch breaks apart the creation of the pass manager from gcc::context's
> ctor. This will allow us to register additional dumps between the dumpfile
> manager creation and the pass manager. As I described in
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/g
On 05/16/2017 11:26 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
This patch breaks apart the creation of the pass manager from
gcc::context's ctor. This will allow us to register additional dumps
... https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg01295.html
This patch builds upon the context creation patch (this
This patch breaks apart the creation of the pass manager from
gcc::context's ctor. This will allow us to register additional dumps
between the dumpfile manager creation and the pass manager. As I
described in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg01164.html
when I tried to do this for
16 matches
Mail list logo
