On 11/17/14 18:52, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> What you said sound reasonable to me.
>
> I shall try to send patch v2 within this week (use pretty_printer).
>
> Thanks.
>
> On 11/17/14 16:15, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:38:19AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>>> I think easiest
What you said sound reasonable to me.
I shall try to send patch v2 within this week (use pretty_printer).
Thanks.
On 11/17/14 16:15, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:38:19AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:16:32AM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
>>> On Mon
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:38:19AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:16:32AM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 06:40:26AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> > > According to the next code, 'pretty_name' may need additional bytes more
> > > than 16. For simplify t
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:16:32AM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 06:40:26AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> > According to the next code, 'pretty_name' may need additional bytes more
> > than 16. For simplify thinking and being extensible in future, extent it
> > to 256 bytes, dir
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 06:40:26AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> According to the next code, 'pretty_name' may need additional bytes more
> than 16. For simplify thinking and being extensible in future, extent it
> to 256 bytes, directly.
I think + 128 bytes should be enough for everyone.
Mar
According to the next code, 'pretty_name' may need additional bytes more
than 16. For simplify thinking and being extensible in future, extent it
to 256 bytes, directly.
It passes testsuite under fedora 20 x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
2014-11-17 Chen Gang
* ubsan.c (ubsan_type_descripto
