[PING][PING][PATCH] for for c/PR57541

2013-07-10 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Subject: FW: [PING][PATCH] for for c/PR57541 > > Hello everyone, > Is this Patch OK for trunk? > > -Balaji V. Iyer. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Iyer, Balaji V > > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 8:10 AM > > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.or

FW: [PING][PATCH] for for c/PR57541

2013-07-02 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello everyone, Is this Patch OK for trunk? -Balaji V. Iyer. > -Original Message- > From: Iyer, Balaji V > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 8:10 AM > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: [PING][PATCH] for for c/PR57541 > > Hello Everyone, > Is

[PING][PATCH] for for c/PR57541

2013-06-17 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone, Is this patch OK for trunk? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. > -Original Message- > From: Iyer, Balaji V > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1:22 PM > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: anna.m.tikhon...@gmail.com > Subject: [PATCH] for for c/PR57541 &

[PATCH] for for c/PR57541

2013-06-12 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone, Attach, please find a patch that will fix the issues in C/PR57541. The issue reported was that the parameters passed into the builtin array notation reduction functions were not checked correctly. This patch should fix that issue. It is tested on x86 and x86_64 and it see