On Thu, 13 Jul 2023, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Question for the experts: how is this handled? Do I need to apply this
> > change to my workspace and commit it, with Mikael as the change author?
> That's what I usually do for someone without write access. commit it locally
> using the -
> On Jul 13, 2023, at 12:47 PM, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>
> If the stack frame only contains an alloca area, then
> pdp11_expand_epilogue fails to deallocate it, resulting
> in callee-saved registers and the return address being
> restored from the wrong stack slots. Fixed by adding
> || cfu
On 7/13/23 11:46, Paul Koning via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Jul 13, 2023, at 12:47 PM, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
If the stack frame only contains an alloca area, then
pdp11_expand_epilogue fails to deallocate it, resulting
in callee-saved registers and the return address being
restored from th
> On Jul 13, 2023, at 12:47 PM, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>
> If the stack frame only contains an alloca area, then
> pdp11_expand_epilogue fails to deallocate it, resulting
> in callee-saved registers and the return address being
> restored from the wrong stack slots. Fixed by adding
> || cfu
If the stack frame only contains an alloca area, then
pdp11_expand_epilogue fails to deallocate it, resulting
in callee-saved registers and the return address being
restored from the wrong stack slots. Fixed by adding
|| cfun->calls_alloca to the condition for deallocating
the frame.
Tested with
