> The FSF has had my papers since Feb '11, but are stalling trying to decide
> whether to accept my employer's slightly non-standard disclaimer or not.
Ah. That seems a long time even for this kind of things.
Anyhow, this particular patch consisted of exactly 4 casts, so it seems to fall
in the
Nicola Pero writes:
> > (I don't have svn write access so I'll need someone else to commit it if
> > it's approved.)
>
> I can apply it for you. But ... do you have a copyright assignment in place
> for contributions to GCC ? The patch looks small and trivial enough that
> I think I can ap
> (I don't have svn write access so I'll need someone else to commit it if
> it's approved.)
I can apply it for you. But ... do you have a copyright assignment in place
for contributions to GCC ? The patch looks small and trivial enough that
I think I can apply it without a signed copyright assi
On Oct 16, 2011, at 4:28 AM, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> This fixes a bootstrap failure on trunk with objc enabled
> Ok for trunk?
Ok.
This fixes a bootstrap failure on trunk with objc enabled, caused by a
recent change which introduced for-loops that compare a size_t index
variable with a TREE_VEC_LENGTH limit. TREE_VEC_LENGTH returns a signed
integer, resulting in a signed/unsigned comparison. The C++ front-end
fails to catch
