On 10.06.2025 21:11, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 6/9/25 23:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.06.2025 17:28, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>>> On 6/6/25 00:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
As per documentation, even 4.7 ought to suffice. At least 4.13 objects
to there being nothing ahead of the first comma
On 6/9/25 23:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.06.2025 17:28, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 6/6/25 00:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
As per documentation, even 4.7 ought to suffice. At least 4.13 objects
to there being nothing ahead of the first comma in @xref{}.
---
The text inserted it merely a guess; I'm op
On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 11:50 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> As per documentation, even 4.7 ought to suffice. At least 4.13 objects
> to there being nothing ahead of the first comma in @xref{}.
> ---
> The text inserted it merely a guess; I'm open to better suggestions.
>
> Noticed with gcc15, so may wa
On 06.06.2025 17:28, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 6/6/25 00:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> As per documentation, even 4.7 ought to suffice. At least 4.13 objects
>> to there being nothing ahead of the first comma in @xref{}.
>> ---
>> The text inserted it merely a guess; I'm open to better suggestions.
On 6/6/25 00:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
As per documentation, even 4.7 ought to suffice. At least 4.13 objects
to there being nothing ahead of the first comma in @xref{}.
---
The text inserted it merely a guess; I'm open to better suggestions.
Noticed with gcc15, so may want backporting.
--- a/gcc/
As per documentation, even 4.7 ought to suffice. At least 4.13 objects
to there being nothing ahead of the first comma in @xref{}.
---
The text inserted it merely a guess; I'm open to better suggestions.
Noticed with gcc15, so may want backporting.
--- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/extend.t
