On Mon, 2020-01-20 at 12:54 +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> g:3bd2918594dae34ae84f mishandled the case in which only the
> tail end of a multireg hard register is invalidated by the call.
> Walking all the entries should be both safer and more precise.
>
> Avoiding cselib_invalidate_regno also m
g:3bd2918594dae34ae84f mishandled the case in which only the
tail end of a multireg hard register is invalidated by the call.
Walking all the entries should be both safer and more precise.
Avoiding cselib_invalidate_regno also means that we no longer
walk the same list multiple times (which is som
