Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Rainer Orth wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 03:46:18PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Unfortunately, several targets have ABI constraints that prevent
> an indirect tail-call, which results in the PRs compile error.
>>
>> So .. after scanning the current published
Hi Iain,
> Rainer Orth wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 03:46:18PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Unfortunately, several targets have ABI constraints that prevent
an indirect tail-call, which results in the PRs compile error.
>
> So .. after scanning the current published testsuite res
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Orth wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 03:46:18PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Unfortunately, several targets have ABI constraints that prevent
an indirect tail-call, which results in the PRs compile error.
So .. after scanning the current published testsuite results I have:
//
Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Segher,
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 03:46:18PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Unfortunately, several targets have ABI constraints that prevent
an indirect tail-call, which results in the PRs compile error.
diff --git
a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfe
Hi Segher,
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 03:46:18PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> Unfortunately, several targets have ABI constraints that prevent
>> an indirect tail-call, which results in the PRs compile error.
>
>> diff --git
>> a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C
Hi!
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 03:46:18PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Unfortunately, several targets have ABI constraints that prevent
> an indirect tail-call, which results in the PRs compile error.
> diff --git
> a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C
> b/gcc/tes
Hi Iain,
> Rainer Orth wrote:
>
>>> diff --git
>>> a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C
>>> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C
>>> index 864846e365c..8211e8250ff 100644
>>> ---
>>> a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Orth wrote:
diff --git
a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C
index 864846e365c..8211e8250ff 100644
---
a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-
Hi Iain,
> diff --git
> a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C
> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C
> index 864846e365c..8211e8250ff 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C
> +++ b/
On 4/11/20 10:46 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi Folks,
sorry for the long CC list - please feel free to ignore if you don’t care :)
I propose that this PR should be re-categorized as a “C++” one.
The reason is that this is not an oversight in the GCC implementation,
but a problem present in the gene
Hi Folks,
sorry for the long CC list - please feel free to ignore if you don’t care :)
I propose that this PR should be re-categorized as a “C++” one.
The reason is that this is not an oversight in the GCC implementation,
but a problem present in the general case. Library implementors feel
stron
11 matches
Mail list logo