On 2/18/21 8:51 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 2/18/21 7:23 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The fix for PR 97172 that removes non-constant VLA bounds from
attribute access is incomplete: it inadvertently removes the bounds
corresponding to just the first VLA argument, and not from subsequent
arguments.
The a
On 2/18/21 7:23 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> The fix for PR 97172 that removes non-constant VLA bounds from
> attribute access is incomplete: it inadvertently removes the bounds
> corresponding to just the first VLA argument, and not from subsequent
> arguments.
>
> The attached change removes the
The fix for PR 97172 that removes non-constant VLA bounds from
attribute access is incomplete: it inadvertently removes the bounds
corresponding to just the first VLA argument, and not from subsequent
arguments.
The attached change removes the vestigial condition that causes this
bug. Since it's