Re: [PING][PATCH] c11-atomic-exec-5: Avoid dead code where LDBL_MANT_DIG is 106

2014-11-15 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Joseph Myers wrote: > OK. Applied, thanks. Maciej

Re: [PING][PATCH] c11-atomic-exec-5: Avoid dead code where LDBL_MANT_DIG is 106

2014-11-14 Thread Joseph Myers
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Hi, > > This patch: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg02540.html > > is still waiting, please review. OK. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com

[PING][PATCH] c11-atomic-exec-5: Avoid dead code where LDBL_MANT_DIG is 106

2014-11-14 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
Hi, This patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg02540.html is still waiting, please review. Thanks, Maciej

[PATCH] c11-atomic-exec-5: Avoid dead code where LDBL_MANT_DIG is 106

2014-10-24 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
Hi, Commit 216437 missed a part of Adhemerval's original change that made `long_double_add_overflow', `complex_long_double_add_overflow', `long_double_sub_overflow' and `complex_long_double_sub_overflow' tests consistently defined only if called. These tests are now only made under the `LDBL