On 10/15/2015 06:25 AM, Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 06:18:03PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
>On 10/14/2015 03:42 PM, Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:36:43AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>On 10/13/2015 04:47 PM, Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote:
> >>>* gcc/
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 06:18:03PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 10/14/2015 03:42 PM, Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:36:43AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>On 10/13/2015 04:47 PM, Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote:
> >>>* gcc/doc/extend.texi: documentation says that functions decl
On 10/14/2015 03:42 PM, Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:36:43AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 10/13/2015 04:47 PM, Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote:
* gcc/doc/extend.texi: documentation says that functions declared
`inline' would not be integrated if they are called before they are
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:36:43AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 10/13/2015 04:47 PM, Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote:
> >* gcc/doc/extend.texi: documentation says that functions declared
> >`inline' would not be integrated if they are called before they are
> >defined or if they are recursive. Both of
On 10/13/2015 04:47 PM, Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote:
* gcc/doc/extend.texi: documentation says that functions declared
`inline' would not be integrated if they are called before they are
defined or if they are recursive. Both of these statements is now
false as shown in examples on Bugzilla.
It mi
* gcc/doc/extend.texi: documentation says that functions declared
`inline' would not be integrated if they are called before they are
defined or if they are recursive. Both of these statements is now
false as shown in examples on Bugzilla.
---
gcc/doc/extend.texi | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 3 i
