like so? Bootstrap / regtest in progress.
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] c++: more ahead-of-time -Wparentheses warnings
Now that we don't have to worry about looking through NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR,
we can easily extend the -Wparentheses warning in convert_for_assignment
to consider (non-depe
plicit
> > > INDIRECT_REF in -Wparentheses warning logic, and generalize
> > > to use is_assignment_op_expr_p.
> >
> > Do we want to factor out the whole warning logic rather than adjust it in
> > both
> > places?
>
> Sounds good, like so? Boot
o we want to factor out the whole warning logic rather than adjust it in both
> places?
Sounds good, like so? Bootstrap / regtest in progress.
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] c++: more ahead-of-time -Wparentheses warnings
Now that we don't have to worry about looking through NON_DEPENDENT_EX
On 10/25/23 14:55, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
Now that we don't have to worry about looking thruogh NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR,
we can easily extend the -Wparentheses warning in convert_for_assignment
to consider (non-de
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
Now that we don't have to worry about looking thruogh NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR,
we can easily extend the -Wparentheses warning in convert_for_assignment
to consider (non-dependent) templated assignment operator exp
