On 4/12/25 12:20 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/11/25 4:36 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
GCC 15 perhaps?
-- >8 --
Here checking
static_assert(0 == big_calc());
takes twice as mu
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 4/11/25 4:36 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
> > GCC 15 perhaps?
> >
> > -- >8 --
> >
> > Here checking
> >
> >static_assert(0 == big_calc());
> >
> > takes twice as much ti
On 4/11/25 4:36 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
GCC 15 perhaps?
-- >8 --
Here checking
static_assert(0 == big_calc());
takes twice as much time as
constexpr int ret = big_calc();
static_assert(0 == ret);
ultimately b
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
GCC 15 perhaps?
-- >8 --
Here checking
static_assert(0 == big_calc());
takes twice as much time as
constexpr int ret = big_calc();
static_assert(0 == ret);
ultimately because in the former, we first constexpr evalu
