Re: [PATCH] c++: c->B::m access resolved through current inst [PR116320]

On 8/14/24 10:50 AM, Patrick Palka wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk and later backports? Yes. -- >8 -- Here when checking the access of (the injected-class-name) B in c->B::m at parse time, we notice its scope B (now the type) is a base of

[PATCH] c++: c->B::m access resolved through current inst [PR116320]

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk and later backports? -- >8 -- Here when checking the access of (the injected-class-name) B in c->B::m at parse time, we notice its scope B (now the type) is a base of the object type C, so we proceed to use C as qualif