On 12/19/22 13:13, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/6/22 13:35, Patrick Palka wrote:
This patch fixes some issues with substitution into a C++20 template
parameter object wrapper:
* The first testcase demonstrates a situation where the same_type_p
asser
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/6/22 13:35, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > This patch fixes some issues with substitution into a C++20 template
> > parameter object wrapper:
> >
> > * The first testcase demonstrates a situation where the same_type_p
> >assert in relevant case of t
On 12/6/22 13:35, Patrick Palka wrote:
This patch fixes some issues with substitution into a C++20 template
parameter object wrapper:
* The first testcase demonstrates a situation where the same_type_p
assert in relevant case of tsubst_copy doesn't hold, because (partial)
substitution of {
om tsubst_copy and moves the
> > REF_PARENTHESIZED_P handling to tsubst_copy_and_build.
>
> On second thought, getting rid of the location_wrapper_p and
> REF_PARENTHESIZED_P handling from tsubst_copy is perhaps too
> risky at this stage. The following patch instead just mo
opy is perhaps too
risky at this stage. The following patch instead just moves
the tparm object wrapper handling from tsubst_copy to
tsubst_copy_and_build and leaves the rest of tsubst_copy alone.
Smoke tested so far, full bootstrap+regtest in progress:
-- >8--
Subject: [PATCH] c++: NTTP object w
This patch fixes some issues with substitution into a C++20 template
parameter object wrapper:
* The first testcase demonstrates a situation where the same_type_p
assert in relevant case of tsubst_copy doesn't hold, because (partial)
substitution of {int,} into the VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR wrapper yi
