On Fri, 2 Aug 2024, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 05:18:35PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 8/1/24 4:20 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
> > >
> > > -- >8 --
> > > Despite a number of mitigations (don't warn for std::
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 05:18:35PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 8/1/24 4:20 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
> >
> > -- >8 --
> > Despite a number of mitigations (don't warn for std::span-like classes,
> > lambdas, adding [[gnu::no_dangl
On 8/1/24 4:20 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
-- >8 --
Despite a number of mitigations (don't warn for std::span-like classes,
lambdas, adding [[gnu::no_dangling]], etc.), the warning still seems to
cause some grief. Let's move the warning
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
-- >8 --
Despite a number of mitigations (don't warn for std::span-like classes,
lambdas, adding [[gnu::no_dangling]], etc.), the warning still seems to
cause some grief. Let's move the warning to -Wextra, then.
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
On 5/1/23 19:54, Marek Polacek wrote:
Sadly, -Wdangling-reference generates false positives for std::span-like
user classes, and it seems imprudent to attempt to improve the heuristic
in GCC 13. Let's move the warning to -Wextra, that will hopefully
reduce the number of false positives the users
Sadly, -Wdangling-reference generates false positives for std::span-like
user classes, and it seems imprudent to attempt to improve the heuristic
in GCC 13. Let's move the warning to -Wextra, that will hopefully
reduce the number of false positives the users have been seeing with 13.
I'm leaving
