On 11/20/20 6:08 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/19/20 11:41 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/17/20 3:44 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 01:33:48AM -0500, Jason Merrill via
Gcc-patches wrote:
Why doesn't the middle-end warning work for inline functions?
It does but only when they'
On 11/19/20 11:41 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/17/20 3:44 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 01:33:48AM -0500, Jason Merrill via
Gcc-patches wrote:
Why doesn't the middle-end warning work for inline functions?
It does but only when they're called (and, as usual, also unless
the
On 11/17/20 3:44 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 01:33:48AM -0500, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
Why doesn't the middle-end warning work for inline functions?
It does but only when they're called (and, as usual, also unless
the uninitialized use is eliminated).
Yes, but
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 01:33:48AM -0500, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > > > > Why doesn't the middle-end warning work for inline functions?
> > > >
> > > > It does but only when they're called (and, as usual, also unless
> > > > the unin
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 09:44:26AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > I think for unused functions we don't even gimplify unused functions, the
> > > cgraph code just throws them away. Even trying just to run the first few
> > > passes (gimplification up to uninit1) would have several high costs,
>
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 09:44:26AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > I think for unused functions we don't even gimplify unused functions, the
> > cgraph code just throws them away. Even trying just to run the first few
> > passes (gimplification up to uninit1) would have several high costs,
> Note th
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 01:33:48AM -0500, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > > Why doesn't the middle-end warning work for inline functions?
> > >
> > > It does but only when they're called (and, as usual, also unless
> > > the uninitialized use is eliminated).
> >
> > Yes, but why? I
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 01:33:48AM -0500, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > Why doesn't the middle-end warning work for inline functions?
> >
> > It does but only when they're called (and, as usual, also unless
> > the uninitialized use is eliminated).
>
> Yes, but why? I assume because
On 11/16/20 10:13 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/16/20 12:02 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/16/20 12:42 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/15/20 3:44 PM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
This patch implements the long-desired -Wuninitialized warning for
member initializer lists, so that the fron
On 11/16/20 12:02 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/16/20 12:42 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/15/20 3:44 PM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
This patch implements the long-desired -Wuninitialized warning for
member initializer lists, so that the front end can detect bugs like
struct A {
On 11/16/20 2:24 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 02:02:00PM -0500, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 11/16/20 12:42 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/15/20 3:44 PM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
This patch implements the long-desired -Wuninitialized warning for
member
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 02:02:00PM -0500, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 11/16/20 12:42 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 11/15/20 3:44 PM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > This patch implements the long-desired -Wuninitialized warning for
> > > member initializer lists, so that t
On 11/16/20 12:42 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/15/20 3:44 PM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
This patch implements the long-desired -Wuninitialized warning for
member initializer lists, so that the front end can detect bugs like
struct A {
int a;
int b;
A() : b(1), a(b)
On 11/15/20 3:44 PM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
This patch implements the long-desired -Wuninitialized warning for
member initializer lists, so that the front end can detect bugs like
struct A {
int a;
int b;
A() : b(1), a(b) { }
};
where the field 'b' is used uni
This patch implements the long-desired -Wuninitialized warning for
member initializer lists, so that the front end can detect bugs like
struct A {
int a;
int b;
A() : b(1), a(b) { }
};
where the field 'b' is used uninitialized because the order of member
initializers in the member
15 matches
Mail list logo
