On 6/2/22 16:33, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 04:26:27PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/2/22 16:10, Marek Polacek wrote:
index 1346a1d4c10..2bbd8785627 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
@@ -9039,10 +9039,18 @@ potential_constant_expression_1 (tree t, b
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 04:26:27PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 6/2/22 16:10, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > index 1346a1d4c10..2bbd8785627 100644
> > --- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
> > @@ -9039,10 +9039,18 @@ potential_constant_expression_1 (tree t, bool
> > want_rval, bool
On 6/2/22 16:10, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 03:42:15PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/2/22 10:03, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 08:42:36AM -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
Here we ICE because value_depende
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 03:42:15PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 6/2/22 10:03, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 08:42:36AM -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > On Wed, 1 Jun 2022, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > >
> > > > Here we ICE because value_dependent_expression_p ge
On 6/2/22 10:03, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 08:42:36AM -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
Here we ICE because value_dependent_expression_p gets a NEW_EXPR
whose operand is a type, and we go to the default case which just
calls
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 08:42:36AM -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jun 2022, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > Here we ICE because value_dependent_expression_p gets a NEW_EXPR
> > whose operand is a type, and we go to the default case which just
> > calls v_d_e_p on each operand o
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Here we ICE because value_dependent_expression_p gets a NEW_EXPR
> whose operand is a type, and we go to the default case which just
> calls v_d_e_p on each operand of the NEW_EXPR. Since one of them
> is a type, we crash on the new asser
Here we ICE because value_dependent_expression_p gets a NEW_EXPR
whose operand is a type, and we go to the default case which just
calls v_d_e_p on each operand of the NEW_EXPR. Since one of them
is a type, we crash on the new assert in t_d_e_p.
t_d_e_p has code to handle {,VEC_}NEW_EXPR, which a
